Last fall, Phil, the head of talent acquisition at a large food processing company shared a moment of frustration. After posting a highly specialized R&D role on several major job boards, his team received over 800 applications within 72 hours. Fewer than 50 met the basic qualifications. Several were clearly AI-generated. One applicant submitted five identical résumés under different names. Phil admitted despite having a capable team and a well-configured applicant-tracking system, they were overwhelmed and no closer to finding the right candidate. “We were buried in noise,” he said. “It felt like the harder we tried to cast a wide net, the less control we had over who actually got through.”
According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, recruiting has become an arms race of automation, volume, and noise. Employers, especially in high-skill industries like technology, finance, and life sciences, are inundated with applications that often lack relevance or substance. Many of these submissions are either spammed by bots or pushed through by candidates playing a numbers game. The result is a hiring process that favors persistence over precision and overwhelms human resources teams with false positives.
For companies that depend on building high-performance teams, this approach is no longer acceptable. The risk of hiring someone who looks good on paper but fails to align with the company’s expectations or culture is too great. While automated tracking, keyword filters, one-click applications once felt like progress, they have created a new set of problems. Employers are now asking a different question. How do we design a process that attracts the right candidates, not just the most aggressive ones?
The Metiss Group has worked closely with leadership teams who face the consequences of hiring misalignment. When recruiting methods prioritize speed and ease, they often compromise long-term leadership development and team cohesion. That tradeoff undermines strategic execution, cultural consistency, and employee performance. To correct this, forward-thinking companies are embracing a more disciplined approach.
They are not making it easier to apply. They are making it harder, on purpose.
In this article, you will learn:
- Why companies are abandoning traditional applicant-tracking systems
- How hiring managers are building “speed bumps” into the recruiting process
- Why harder applications could lead to better hires
- What this means for candidates who are actually qualified
- How leadership development programs can benefit from this shift
Why Companies Are Abandoning Traditional Applicant-Tracking Systems
Applicant-tracking systems were designed to manage volume. As job applications moved online, companies adopted these platforms to handle large numbers of submissions efficiently. That worked in theory, but in practice, the filters often promote candidates who understand how to game the system rather than those who are best qualified. As automation increased, discernment declined.
Companies are rethinking this model. Some are pulling job posts from major boards and placing them in less trafficked locations. In certain cases, companies are returning to classified ads. These ads sometimes list the hiring manager by name and invite direct résumé submissions. This approach reduces dependency on algorithmic filtering and restores the human judgment that has been lost in many recruiting processes.
By removing barriers between applicants and decision-makers, companies are reclaiming control over how they evaluate talent. This shift allows for greater intentionality and creates space for context that automated systems often ignore.
How Hiring Managers Are Building “Speed Bumps” into the Recruiting Process
The goal is no longer to make it easy for anyone to apply. The goal is to create friction to reveal who is serious. Some companies are extending application forms, adding open-response questions, and requiring tailored cover letters. Others are asking for professional references earlier in the process, before interviews are scheduled.
These requirements serve as early indicators of commitment. A candidate who takes time to write thoughtfully and follow detailed instructions is more likely to bring that level of discipline into the role. A candidate who abandons the application because it is inconvenient is unlikely to be a reliable long-term hire.
Hiring managers who take this approach often find they are left with fewer applications, but better ones. Time once spent sifting through irrelevant résumés can now be focused on evaluating fit and potential. This allows companies to better assess emotional intelligence in the workplace and identify leadership styles that align with team dynamics.
Why Harder Applications Could Lead to Better Hires
The best hiring decisions do not come from casting the widest net. They come from evaluating the right candidates with the right expectations. When the process filters for engagement and effort, companies gain more than technical qualifications. They gain insight into character and alignment.
Making the application process more rigorous allows hiring teams to set the tone early. It communicates performance matters and attention to detail will be noticed. This foundation helps avoid future missteps difficult to correct through leadership training programs or performance reviews.
Companies are also re-evaluating the timing and purpose of reference checks. These are no longer seen as final-stage formalities. In many cases, they are used to validate signals gathered early in the process. When done with care, these conversations offer a more complete view of a candidate’s emotional intelligence, decision-making, and adaptability; these traits shape long-term success far more than résumés alone.
What This Means for Candidates Who Are Actually Qualified
The landscape is becoming less favorable for candidates who rely on volume. Those who blast generic applications to dozens of companies will encounter more resistance. But for professionals who take the time to understand the role and tailor their approach, the odds are beginning to improve.
A harder process does not guarantee a better job. It does, however, increase the likelihood qualified applicants will be seen and taken seriously. Companies are signaling they value substance over noise. That creates an opportunity for strong candidates to stand out more clearly.
This shift also reinforces the importance of soft skills. Candidates who succeed in these processes often bring self-awareness, persistence, and strong communication—qualities that contribute to leadership development and team cohesion. The same traits that help candidates persist through a demanding application process are often the ones that help them thrive once hired.
How Leadership Development Programs Can Benefit from This Shift
Hiring is the foundation of any successful leadership development strategy. When companies hire with discipline, they build teams easier to coach, train, and promote. When the hiring process is careless, leadership development becomes reactive and inefficient.
Organizations investing in executive leadership coaching, emotional intelligence courses, or leadership development classes often find the impact of these programs is limited by the quality of the talent pipeline. By introducing friction into the application process, companies improve that pipeline. They can then direct leadership training toward individuals who have already demonstrated alignment with company values and performance standards.
Leadership and development efforts are most effective when they begin with the right people. A rigorous hiring process makes that possible.
Takeaways
Recruiting volume has come at a cost. High-quality applicants are lost in the noise, and leadership teams are left dealing with the consequences. Companies are responding with a new kind of discipline. They are creating hiring processes to filter for focus, effort, and alignment.
This change does not mean companies are becoming less accessible. It means they are becoming more intentional. The result is fewer poor hires, stronger leadership pipelines, and better employee performance across the board.
At The Metiss Group, we help organizations design hiring systems to serve strategic goals and support leadership development. When hiring gets harder for the right reasons, everything else gets easier.
And Phil? He adjusted. His team stopped relying on job boards and started asking for writing samples and short problem-solving prompts upfront. The flood of low-effort applications slowed and the right people began to stand out. Last quarter, they made three critical hires. Not because it was easy, but because it was intentional.
Unlock deeper leadership insights—download The Metiss Group’s EQ 360 today to gain comprehensive insights into your emotional intelligence
Topics:
