Should Leaders Require Their Direct Reports to Use AI Tools?
November 24th, 2025
4 min read
By John Gave
For more than three decades, Alice was the backbone of her company’s operations. She had weathered every wave of technological innovation: from calculators that simplified the math on her desk, to clunky desktop computers that transformed her workflow, to the abrupt appearance of fax machines, to the always-on, ever-demanding world of email. With each new development, Alice’s response was consistent. She approached the change with apprehension, clinging to the familiar ways of working and often voicing doubts about the promise of these new tools. Joe, her manager, became practiced in walking the line between patience and persistence. He gave Alice room to vent her frustrations, encouraged her to experiment with new technologies, and steadily insisted that she adapt. Over time, and often more slowly than others, Alice adopted every major tool, ultimately improving her performance and value to the team.
Many leaders today are facing the same dilemma Joe once confronted. The current disruption, however, carries a distinct urgency. Artificial intelligence is not just another tool on the shelf: its impact on productivity, decision making, and competitive advantage is immediate and profound. Unlike previous technological advances, organizations do not have the luxury of gradual adoption. Leaders must confront a critical question: How firmly should they require their direct reports to use AI tools?
The rapid evolution of AI in the workplace demands a different leadership approach. The leader’s task is to balance empathy with insistence, ensuring every team member gains proficiency in leveraging these new tools. Dictates and top-down mandates alone will not drive meaningful adoption. Leaders must instead create an environment where learning, experimentation, and collaboration are valued, but where the expectation to use AI is clear and non-negotiable.
In this article, you will learn:
- The Leadership Dilemma: Encouraging AI Adoption Without Creating Resistance
- The Productivity Imperative: Why AI Integration Cannot Wait
- Empathetic Yet Firm Leadership: Strategies for Fostering Adoption
- Building a Collaborative Learning Culture Around AI
The Leadership Dilemma: Encouraging AI Adoption Without Creating Resistance
The story of Alice is not unique. Every organization includes employees who approach new technology with skepticism. Change can trigger anxiety, particularly for those who have mastered legacy systems and processes. Leaders know from experience that forced adoption rarely sticks and can damage morale. However, allowing extended avoidance of new tools undermines team performance and leaves the organization exposed to competitive risk.
The question is not whether employees should use AI. The reality is clear: integrating AI into daily workflows is necessary to maintain and enhance productivity. The true dilemma is how leaders can set clear expectations without alienating valued contributors. The stakes are higher today, as AI’s adoption curve is measured in months, not years.
The Productivity Imperative: Why AI Integration Cannot Wait
AI is redefining operational efficiency. From automating repetitive tasks to generating sophisticated business insights, these tools are delivering measurable gains in productivity and decision quality. Leaders who hesitate to require adoption risk falling behind more agile competitors.
The Metiss Group has observed firsthand how AI integration can lift organizational performance. Teams that embraced AI reported streamlined processes, fewer manual errors, and accelerated innovation. For organizations, this translates into tangible benefits: reduced operational costs, faster execution, and the ability to adapt quickly to market changes. AI is not a passing trend; it is a strategic asset, and leaders must position their teams to capitalize on its potential.
Empathetic Yet Firm Leadership: Strategies for Fostering Adoption
Mandates and rigid directives rarely produce sustainable change. Effective leaders recognize that resistance to AI often stems from fear—fear of obsolescence, failure, or losing one’s identity as a subject matter expert. Instead of issuing ultimatums, leaders must approach adoption as a guided process.
One proven strategy is pairing reluctant adopters with colleagues who are further along the AI learning curve. This creates opportunities for informal knowledge transfer and helps build confidence. In one case, The Metiss Group implemented a weekly Level 10 meeting format where each team member shared one way they used AI in their work that week. The initial examples were basic—using AI to streamline online searches or automate email sorting. Over time, the group’s sophistication grew. Employees began exploring how AI could accelerate project timelines, improve customer communications, and support strategic decision making. Peer learning demystified the technology and built a culture where experimentation was encouraged and rewarded.
Setting clear expectations is also essential. Leaders must state unequivocally that AI is a required part of the workflow, while providing training and resources to help everyone succeed. Feedback, recognition, and patient coaching reinforce the message that proficiency is both expected and attainable.
Building a Collaborative Learning Culture Around AI
Leaders who succeed at driving AI adoption foster a culture of collaboration and curiosity. They model openness to learning by sharing their own experiments with AI, including failures and setbacks. This transparency reduces stigma and makes the learning journey accessible.
Organizations benefit from creating forums—formal or informal—where employees can discuss AI applications, share lessons learned, and troubleshoot challenges. Regular check-ins, roundtable discussions, or internal workshops can accelerate collective learning. Some teams have seen success by rotating the responsibility for presenting an AI success story or challenge during weekly meetings. These rituals establish a shared language around AI and embed its use into the team’s DNA.
Training and development programs are another critical component. The Metiss Group recommends integrating AI competencies into leadership development classes, performance reviews, and ongoing skill-building sessions. This approach ensures adoption is sustained and becomes a core organizational capability.
Takeaways
Requiring direct reports to use AI is not a matter of preference. It is a strategic imperative in today’s competitive business environment. Leaders face the challenge of balancing empathy for those struggling with change against the necessity for rapid adoption. The most effective path combines clear expectations with robust support, leveraging peer learning and creating a collaborative culture that rewards experimentation.
AI will continue to reshape the nature of work, and the leaders who act decisively will position their teams for long-term success. The lesson from Alice’s story remains relevant: patient guidance, coupled with firm direction, enables even the most reluctant adopters to thrive in the face of innovation. The difference now is pace. Leaders must move quickly, foster a culture of continuous learning, and ensure no one is left behind as organizations embrace the transformative potential of artificial intelligence.